Editorial: When Using Animal Tests or Alternative Methods, We are Also Testing Ourselves

///Editorial: When Using Animal Tests or Alternative Methods, We are Also Testing Ourselves

Editorial: When Using Animal Tests or Alternative Methods, We are Also Testing Ourselves

Michael Balls

The correlation between the effects measured in a supposedly useful test with a model system (such as an animal or an in vitro system) and the likely effects in the object of interest (such as a human being) must fall between 50% (the equivalent of tossing a coin, so a relationship below this would be useless) and 100% (which is unattainable, given the inevitably of significant differences between the test system and the object system, and variation in the responses in both of them).
You need to register (for free) to download this article. Please log in/register here.
2017-01-09T06:38:52+00:00 Tags: , |